My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2019-3002
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2019
>
Reso 2019-3002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2019 10:47:16 AM
Creation date
10/22/2019 12:18:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2019-3002
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
10/17/2019
Description
Approve 3rd Amend w/Perkins+Will for 18080 Collins Gov’t Annex Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
liorntori T© seri Additional Service Request <br /> To Lawarence Kline FROM Brad Malmsten <br /> COMPANY . Perkins+Will DATE July 19,2019 <br /> RE ASR-001 PROJECT NO. 1(18051.00 <br /> • <br /> FEE TYPE Timecard SUB/PHASE NO. a001 <br /> PROJECT <br /> CC Jose Bofill;Michelle()lender . NAME Sunny Isles Beach Pedestrian Bridge <br /> ASR DESCRIPTION Additional Project Requirements Related to FOOT <br /> ASR BACKGROUND&SCOPE • <br /> According to the original Agreements,"Coordination with the Department of Transportation(DOT)and other <br /> regulatory agencies having Jurisdiction over Collins Avenue will be billed as an hourly expense for the Architect <br /> and Engineering Consultants as these traditionally carry longer durations and multiple meetings throughout the <br /> design process...". Effort required from TT related to the involvement of FOOT and its ovefeight Includes: <br /> 1.FOOT reviews: • _ <br /> -Meetings to explain bridge strategy to FOOT representatives • <br /> -FOOT approval process for firm and Individuals <br /> -FOOT review to confirm classification of bridge structure(4.2.2 vs.4.2.3) <br /> -Responding to MOTs questions and concerns related to the brldga structure <br /> -Muitipie'submissions to and reviews by FC70T,as opposed to a single permit review typical of the <br /> building department. <br /> 2.Third party peer review: <br /> -Meeting with multiple potential reviewers to outline design approach . • <br /> -Responding to peer reviewer questions for clarification,etc • <br /> Presenting ttetalied.stru.ctural design to.third party peer review team <br /> Reviewing and,responding t0 peer feview comments • . • <br /> -iricdrporating peer review comments - • • • • • . <br /> • <br /> 3.Application of FDOT and AASHTO requirements in lieu of FRC: <br /> -Wind loading is perAASHTO as opposed toASCE7=10;tthereferencend standard.per FBC • <br /> -Load factors and load combinations are more extensive In AASHTO than FBC,resulting in more data <br /> Input for analysis models and more data to analyze through program oulput <br /> -FOOT prohibits certain types of detailing or construction,requiring alternate approaches to • <br /> otherwise typical detailing <br /> -FOOT strict maintenance requirements: <br /> +Minimum clearance required inside of box girder,limiting geometric options <br /> +Access panels through flanges and diaphragms. <br /> +Special steel connection details required due to access openings <br /> The deliverables associated with this ASR shall be drawing submissions In conformance with FOOT requirements. <br /> Based on the estimated fee build-up below,TT will carry out this additional service on a Time and Materials basis <br /> with a Nat4o•Exceed(NTE)amount of$50,000, We will provide notice to the Client in the event that 90%of the <br /> NTE amount is reached. • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 101`QT..Thud Avenue-Sure 111J i bort I.audetdata.ri 333J1 1 T 254N393001 vrumilrorrronTwna,a:n.con <br /> 1/2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.