My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Zoning Resolution 23-Z-200
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Zoning
>
2023
>
Zoning Resolution 23-Z-200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2023 1:20:36 PM
Creation date
7/12/2023 1:14:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Zoning Resolution
Resolution Number
23-Z-200
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/15/2022
Description
Application for variance PZ2023-06 by Yakov Cohen, failed, there was no second vote so the Reso number is now omitted, therefore there is no Z-23-200.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 15, 2023 <br />PZ2023-06 <br />(4) The alleged hardship is not economic and has not been deliberately created <br />to establish a use or structure, which is not otherwise consistent with the LDRs. <br />(5) Granting of the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the <br />individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings or structures in the <br />same zoning district; <br />(6) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes possible the <br />reasonable use of the land, building or structure; and <br />(7) The grant of the variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose <br />of these LDRs, is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to <br />the public safety and welfare and will not substantially diminish or impair <br />property values within the vicinity. <br />Comments: See attached Letter of Intent from the Applicant and final <br />analysis below provided by staff. <br />V. FINAL ANALYSIS <br />Based on the above review, the application is not consistent with the City's Land <br />Development Regulations. The requested side yard setback variance is in relation to new <br />construction and a hardship has not been identified that supports the proposed setback <br />reduction. The subject property does not have a special condition or circumstance that is <br />not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. The <br />variance is not necessary to make possible reasonable use of the land, building or <br />structure, as access to the rooftop terrace can be accommodated with a staircase <br />elsewhere on the property, without encroaching into the required setbacks. However, <br />granting of the variance is not injurious to the neighborhood and would not otherwise be <br />detrimental to the public safety and welfare and will not substantially diminish or impair <br />property values within the vicinity. <br />The Applicant has asserted in the application that the variance request will not negatively <br />impact the adjacent properties and has obtained "letter of no objections" from three (3) <br />property owners' and residents of Golden Shores. The letters have been submitted with <br />this application. <br />Staff has compiled the relevant facts of the requested variance and recommends the <br />application be presented to City Commission for consideration. <br />VI. CONDITIONS <br />If the City approves this application, the application will be subject to the following <br />conditions set forth below: <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />115 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.