My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Zoning Resolution 25-Z-215
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Zoning
>
2025
>
Zoning Resolution 25-Z-215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2025 4:40:41 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 4:37:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Zoning Resolution
Resolution Number
25-Z-215
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
04/17/2025
Description
Approving in part, denying in part, Appl No. PZ2025-04, submitted by Yehuda Gabay for variance "Lot Line, Front" of Sect. 265-5.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 17, 2025 <br />PZ2025-04 <br />The following are the standards of review for variance applications from code Sec. 265- <br />15.G.: <br />A variance shall be granted only where competent and substantial evidence <br />presented in the particular case shows that all of the following are met.- <br />(1) <br />et. <br />(1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, <br />structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, <br />structures or buildings in the same zoning district, <br />(2) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of <br />the petitioner; <br />(3) Literal interpretation of the provisions of these LDRs deprives the applicant <br />of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district <br />under the terms of this chapter and works unnecessary and undue hardship on <br />the applicant, <br />(4) The alleged hardship is not economic and has not been deliberately created <br />to establish a use or structure, which is not otherwise consistent with the LDRs. <br />(5) Granting of the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the <br />individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings or structures in the <br />same zoning district, <br />(6) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes possible the <br />reasonable use of the land, building or structure; and <br />(7) The grant of the variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose <br />of these LDRs, is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to <br />the public safety and welfare and will not substantially diminish or impair <br />property values within the vicinity. <br />Comments: See attached Letter of Intent from the Applicant and final <br />analysis below provided by staff. <br />V. FINAL ANALYSIS <br />Based on the above review, the application is not consistent with the City's Land <br />Development Regulations. The requested building variances are in relation to new <br />construction and a hardship has not been identified that supports the proposed variances. <br />The subject property does not have a special condition or circumstance that is not <br />applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. The property <br />conforms to the minimum lot size and width requirements. The requested variances are <br />not essential to enable reasonable use of the land, building, or structure, as a new home <br />can be reasonably constructed in compliance with existing regulations. However, granting <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.