My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002 0521 City Commission Workshop
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2002
>
2002 0521 City Commission Workshop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2015 11:15:27 AM
Creation date
8/12/2015 11:15:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
Special
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
05/21/2002
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tri <br /> • <br /> When do vested rights end? The final consensus was that the proposal from Ms. Grubbs- <br /> Freisser should be used, provided that they comply with the conditions and must keep the <br /> permit alive. <br /> There was a consensus that the time period would be the end of the first development <br /> permit (two years). <br /> Most codes establish an extension period of for example six months, having proved some <br /> evidence. <br /> She recommended against requiring registration to establish vesting, provided they have a <br /> development order, and it was agreed. <br /> Public Speakers: Clifford Schulman; <br /> 7. TDR ORDINANCE <br /> Action: Ms. Dannheisser [There is a memo from Hans to the City Commission dated <br /> May 16, 2002 titled “TDR's Ordinance"] <br /> Town center, mixed use neighborhood district, .She noted that there is no town center <br /> district established yet. The Comprehensive Plan says that a transfer of TDR's from a <br /> private site to a public site must serve a public purpose. If multiple developers are <br /> interested in specific TDR's, and the consensus was to then auction the rights. Limited <br /> to 30 To of intensity in transferable development rights based on the intensity of the <br /> receiver site, if to public purpose. Iglesias suggested allowing the development of the <br /> remaining 70% of development rights, based on the receiving site. Samson if a developer <br /> transfers part of his TDR's to another one of his sites, then he gives up his rights to <br /> develop on the donor site. <br /> Commissioner Edelcup noted that we may need to amend the Comp Plan. <br /> Mayor Samson asked about the scenario where a developer owns land on the ocean and <br /> also land on the west side. He wants to transfer the development rights to his ocean <br /> property and then give the west side land to the City for a park. City Attorney <br /> Dannheisser said not a problem. <br /> Public Speakers: Joe Milton; Cliff Schulman; <br /> Schulman suggested allowing the transfers but for a limited time. Dannheisser said that <br /> if Comp Plan is amended, then She reminded that originally the intention for the TDR's <br /> was for the City to be able to sell the TDR's note for the developers to transfer their own. <br /> Vice Mayor Iglesias suggested allowing the developer to develop on the entire site, even <br /> if there was a transfer of part of the development rights. <br /> City Attorney Dannheisser proposed the scenario where the sender site would remain <br /> vacant (it would go to the City) but allow developer to transfer or sell all of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.