Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Mr. De Armas said that he has for the court, Boeing Engineering Corporation which addresses <br /> the same issue, of Indiana, and in that case we had the same thing, we had a bid, a request <br /> for proposals that was to be awarded to the lowest responsible responsive bidder. The <br /> municipality there acted as if they were awarding to the lowest most responsible bidder and <br /> the court said you can't do that, there is a difference between lowest responsible bidder and <br /> lowest most responsible bidder. <br /> Ms. Dickens said then are you saying that when the City awards a construction contract, that <br /> the only consideration that the City can make is the price? Mr. De Armaslsaid no, the City <br /> determines whether bidders are qualified or not, and that, it has an obligation to do, and there <br /> is a set criteria that they use to determine whether somebody is responsive and responsible or <br /> not. Ms. Dickens said then assuming that people are not disqualified, bids come in, some are <br /> thrown out they didn't meet the requirements, they are disqualified, not those, let's assume <br /> that the City has gotten a list of contractors that are qualified to do the work,land so then they <br /> go to the next step, are you then saying that out of that group of those contractors that are <br /> qualified to do the work, the City is then legally required to take the lowest bid and are not to <br /> consider any other factors? Mr. De Armas said absolutely, when it says lowest responsible <br /> bid, that is exactly what it means. Once these bidders are found to *responsible and <br /> response you do not quantify more responsible or less responsible, they a ie all responsible, <br /> now you go to one criteria, lowest bid, and that is exactly what this court:in Indiana said as <br /> well, "The Board may not make comparisons of bidders to determine responsibleness, <br /> responsibleness is a minimal requirement of bidders, not a competitive standard among <br /> bidders. A bidder can be un-responsible only if the awarding body would not award the <br /> contract to the bidder even if that bidder had submitted the only bid. The absence of the term <br /> best, or most responsible unmistakenably demonstrates the legislature did not intend <br /> responsibleness to become a competitive factor between bidders, but rather the legislator <br /> intended to give the Board the discretion to reject bids from contractors who are unable to <br /> perform the work satisfactory they have awarded the contract. The Board may not award the <br /> contract to Boeing simply because the subjective factors met materially in favor of Boeing. <br /> Whether Boeing is more responsible than WPM is irrelevant when determining whether WPM <br /> is the lowest responsible and responsive bidder. <br /> Ms. Dickens said she sees the law is that there are two governing principals as it relates to <br /> awarding contracts in the State of Florida for municipalities, you have the State Statutes, and <br /> you have your local ordinance, and in the absence of a local ordinance, you rely on the State <br /> Statute, however, if you have a local ordinance then that, unless it is contradictory to what the <br /> State law says, controls. Mr. De Armas said he agrees, and Ms. Dickens said with that being <br /> said, you read the Sunny Isles Beach Code, and you see that Sunny Isles Beach not only <br /> limits their bidding to costs, but in their Code in Section 62.8, what do you think of these other <br /> listed factors, and Mr. De Armas said those are factors that you use to determine whether a <br /> bidder is responsible or not, that is the criteria that you use to determine responsibility velnon <br /> period, once you determine that a bidder is responsible then that is it, your discretion is out <br /> the window, you must award to the lowest bidder. It is very simple, in case:after case stands <br /> for the same proposition, the last case he cited was Boiston vs. Nappa Sanitation, and it is a <br /> California case and it says the exact same thing, when we use the term "lowest responsible <br /> bidder", lowest responsible bidder is not to be qualified on responsibility,land the court says <br /> Summary Minutes: Bid Protest 07-10-02 030308 Page 4 of 11 <br />