Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLF' <br /> <br />.... PAR'l"N!:RSHIF OF" PROF"CSSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS <br /><:00 SOL!TH 81~CAYNIO: 80wLIO:VARD, SUITE 2500. MIAMI, FI.ORIDA 3~1-'!1-5~"'O <br />7~1.l;:PHONe:; (305) .374-7ElBO - FAX: (305) 37"'.7593 <br />E-"'-AIL: INFO~eILZIN.COM . WWw.F.lILZ:N.COM <br /> <br />STANL.E:'i 8. PRICE, P.A. <br />D I" '::CT 0 IA~ 1:305) 350-2374 <br /> <br />E:-"'.AIC sprice<lllbilzin.com <br /> <br />October 30. 2003 <br /> <br />VIA FACSIMILE <br /> <br />Mr. Jorge Vera <br />Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />City of SUlmy Isles Beach <br />17070 Collins Avenue, Suite 250 <br />SUn.T1Y Isles Beach, FL 33160 <br /> <br />Re: La Mansion, LLe <br />Zoning Resolution No: 03-Z-75 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Vera: <br /> <br />It has come to our attention that the above-styled Zoning Resolution., as well as the <br />formal advertisement relating 10 the application of La Mansion, LLC (22003-06), does not <br />accmate1y reflect the official action of the City Commission in approving Resolution No. 03-Z- <br />75. <br /> <br />Both the fonnal adveI1ising and the Zoning Resolution contradict the clear and self- <br />evident provisions of the site plan that clearly indicate that an additional 54,000 +/- square <br />fooiage would be rransferred to the site pursuant to the FAR Bonus of 1.00, as well as the <br />purchase of Transfer Development Rights, pursuant to the City's Code of Ordinances. PurSlll:'tnt <br />to condition A.3., 1111:.: City Commission ruled that the approval of the plan, be substantially ill <br />accordance and consistent with the site plan presented at the City Commission hearing on July <br />17, 2003, entitled "Regalia Tabular Data" and II Lobby and Garage Level Lighting Plan", <br />prepared by the Sieger Suarez Architectural Partnership dated revised 7-1-03, consisting of 3 <br />sheets, plans entitled "Regalia", prepared by the Sieger Suarez Architectural PanneTship <br />COJ1.sisting of 25 sheets dated revised 4-04-03 clearly evidences the actual square footage 10 be <br />transferred to the site. 11J addition to the foregoing, the 54,000 +/- square feet to be transferred to <br />the site, is consistent with the City's Land Development Regulations and does nor evidence tbe <br />need for any variances from the' clear provisions of the City Code. <br /> <br />It is clearly within the purview of the City Commission to approve a plan of development <br />consistent whh the Land Development Regulations" The addition.ill square footage, which is <br />erroneousJy labeled the 38,847 square feet of development rights from the City, belies the actual <br />submittal by tlle applicant and tile plans approved by the City Commission. <br /> <br />\7.1420\138%\ 'F 649010 v I <br />10/30/03 10: I R AM <br />