My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2008-1222
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2008
>
Reso 2008-1222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:42:32 AM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2008-1222
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/21/2008
Description
Voluntary Time Extension for Development Approvals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />s....""'" ,,;dvgCi"'C~~ ~"'" 1S,2001 <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach. Florida <br /> <br />8B. An Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida: <br />Amending Ordinance 98-52 to Revise the Time Limit from One Year to Two Years <br />Within \\'hich a Building Permit Must Issue for Any Variance, Special Exception, New <br />Use, Special Permit or Unusual Use Heretofore or Hereafter Granted; Providing for <br />Quarterly Notice in a l\ewspaper of General Circulation Within the City Limits for the <br />Two-Year Time Period; Providing for Administrative Relief Procedure from this <br />Ordinance, Providing for an Appeal to the City Commission; Providing for a Repealer; <br />Providing for Severability; Providing for an Effective Date. <br />(First Reading 2/22/01) <br /> <br />Action: City Clerk Brown-Morilla read the title and City Attorney Dannheisser presented <br />her report. <br /> <br />Public Speakers: \Villiam Lone; Gerry Goodman <br /> <br />Commissioner Iglesias expressed concern about the difficulty for developers, who had <br />recently obtained a zoning approval vvithin the last four or five months, to successfully <br />obtain a building permit within a two-year period. <br /> <br />Commissioner Turetsky asked why these decisions were being taken out of the hands of <br />the City Commission. City Attorney Dannheisser said that it was for the convenience of <br />the Commission and developers, \\rith the developer still having a right to appeal to the <br />City Conunission if they disagree 'with the staff decision on their vested rights appeal. <br />There was considerable discussion regarding the proposal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Turetsky repeated his objection to removing the decision from the City <br />Commission and Commissioner Morrow indicated that she was unc-omfortable with some <br />aspects of the proposal. City Attorney Dannheisser suggested that the motivation in the <br />proposal to have staff re\'iew the vested rights application, was to remove the burden from <br />the City Commission. Vice Mayor Kauffinan asked if under the current Code, can City <br />staff grant a developer, with a pre"ious approval, an administrative variance beyond what <br />the City Commission had approved. City Attorney Dannheisser said yes and explained. <br /> <br />Commissioner Iglesias moved and Vice Mayor Kauffinan seconded a motion to adopt <br />the ordinance. Ordinance No. 2001-117 was adopted by a roll can vote of 4-1 in <br />favor. <br />Vote: <br /> <br />Conunissioner Iglesias <br />Commissioner Morrow <br />Commissioner Turetsky <br />Vice Mayor Kauffinan <br />~1ayor Samson <br /> <br />yes <br />1!Q <br /> <br />yes <br />yes <br />m <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.