My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2008-1222
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2008
>
Reso 2008-1222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:42:32 AM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2008-1222
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/21/2008
Description
Voluntary Time Extension for Development Approvals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />l <br />I <br /> <br />A. John Szerlag <br />January 16,2007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Current Status <br /> <br />With reference to payments of TDR's and bonuses, we currently employ a "Use it or lose it" <br />philosophy unless a developer can show good cause for extending time-frames. Allow me to <br />explain by example. Let's say we have a high-rise condominium project (call it Oui) that <br />generated the following slate of fees: <br /> <br /> Paid at Development Approval Paid at permit <br />Site plan development fee $10,000 - 0 - <br />Bonuses - 0 - $1,155,700 <br />TDR - 0 - $3,749,268 <br />10% ofTDR amount $374,926 (374,926) <br />Building Permit - 0 - $ 650,000 <br />Impact fees - 0 - $ 415,000 <br />Total $384,968 $5,595,042 <br /> <br />The amount to be paid within three days of site plan approval by City Commission is $374,926. <br />The developer in our example has two years from City Council approval to pull a building permit <br />and pay the balance ofTDR's, bonuses and fees. This amount comes to $5,595,042. <br /> <br />Now, if the developer can show "good cause", the City Commission may grant an extension for <br />the developer to remit the balance of bonuses and TDR's. There are a number of reasons for <br />good cause; labor and/or material shortage, litigation, acts of nature. However, economics is not <br />a good cause. Thus a developer cannot get a time extension from the City Commission if the sole <br />argument is predicated on poor market conditions and/or inability to obtain financing. See <br />attached memorandum from City Attorney Hans Ottinot. <br /> <br />So, what options does a developer currently have if economics are the only reason for wanting a <br />time extension? <br /> <br />Using the above example, the developer has two options: walk away from his initial deposit <br />which means that site plan approval expires, or pay the balance of fees due the City. Please <br /> <br />Commission - Policy Voluntary Time Extensions High Rise Cond. D('''-'- "emo <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.