Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 3 <br /> <br />provided to us via the GAF Tariff. FPL promised the MUUC, and confirmed this to the <br />PSC staff, that they would deliver to the PSC in April 2008, their proposal for savings <br />from O&M. FPL did not deliver a credit, FPL delivered a 1% increase in the cost of <br />underground service. The MUUC objected to the tariff being implemented and now <br />we must proceed with a full evidentiary hearing before the PSC to make the case for <br />greater savings instead of an increase in the cost of underground service. The <br />savings to be realized here is potentially the same that each community currently <br />receives from the GAF Tariff (a 25% savings) that is in effect. <br /> <br />The second item this funding request will pay for is extending the 25% credit to <br />the new construction CIAC in circumstances where properties are being retrofitted <br />with underground utility service at the same time as vacant tracts of land. Why <br />should the vacant land portion of the project cost 25% more for underground service <br />in such instances than the cost of converting existing utility facilities at existing <br />properties? Negotiations with FPL were fruitless and amounted to foot dragging in <br />the opinion of MUUC. <br /> <br />Extending the 25% credit to the new construction contribution in aid of construction <br />Numerous cities have encountered a situation where they want to do <br />undeveloped areas (raw land about to be developed) with undergrounding at the <br />same time they are converting existing developments to undergrounding, only to <br />encounter a problem from FPL about extending the 25% credit to the areas being <br />newly developed since that is not in the existing tariff. FPL was unwilling to work out <br />this issue with the MUUC. <br /> <br />We have one more issue that remains and it will not be taken up until the 4th quarter <br />of 2009 and that is the corporate overhead add-on issue with FPL. Therefore, this is not <br />the final payment request. You can anticipate the final payment request in FY 2010 for <br />$12,000. That hearing should be over by April 2010. The current hearing which is the <br />subject of the current payment request should be over by approximately September <br />2009. <br /> <br />If you have additional questions after reading this email, please feel free to contact me. <br />We need all of the financial help we can get now and in the future to enable local <br />government in the FPL service area to deliver more affordable underground utility <br />service. <br />