My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Gannet Fleming
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(07-03-01) General Engineering Services
>
Responses
>
Gannet Fleming
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2011 11:23:03 AM
Creation date
1/27/2011 11:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Engineering Svcs.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
07-03-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. DERM Class [ Permit for Coastal Construction and Mangrove Trimming, Standard Form, may need <br />approval by county Environ-mental Quality Board depending on mangrove impacts and public involvement <br />results. DERM notities all riparian owners within 300 feet of project and a Public Hearing by the County <br />Commission is held for Standard Form permits. Permit process takes 10 weeks to more than I year. <br />Dewatering permit also is obtained by the contractor from the County for unavoidable dewatering. <br />. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination <br />System (NPDES) Permit (under delegation by USEPA in Florida). Construction contractors apply for these <br />permits but utilize Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) that are developed as part of project plan <br />set. Class V Deepwell Permit would also be obtained from FDEP, if needed. GF is proposing swales or othcr, <br />non-injection treatment and disposal methodologies for stormwater from additional impervious surface areas. <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />A voidance and minimization 0 f impacts: <br />. Boardwalk design: providing walkway grating to allow light to enter water below the boardwalk plus a <br />minimum 5-foot understructure elevation from mean high water can avoid "formal consultation" under Section <br />7 of the ESA (personnel communication, Penny Cutt, USACOE, April 20, 2007). Opaque materials have also <br />bcen used in nearby boardwalks/piers to allow Johnson's seagrass more light than grating, avoiding a <br />"Determination of Effect" from NOAA or USFWS. GF alignment could avoid not only mangrove outcrops but <br />potentially the seagrass patches as well. <br />. Bridge design: avoiding or minimizing dredging/tilling wetlands or submerged lands in "other surface waters" <br />(i.e., canal waters past mangroves or seagrasses), minimizing indirect impacts such as shading (minimal bridge <br />deck width, maximum under-deck height by thinner superstructurc design) and avoiding or minimizing <br />placement of bridge structures like piles or piers in the water as much as possible. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Mitigation a mitigation plan will be developed during permitting as necessary, taking into account the following: <br />. Existing mangroves are an "enhancement" mitigation site (mitigation that involved mangrove planting <br />within a naturally occurring marsh) from a nearby project under a SFWMD permit (personnel communication, <br />Ron Peekstok, April 23, 2007) and likely are under a conservation easement. GF can determine the presence, <br />and implications, of such an casemcnt early on in permitting to assist obtaining approval by the SFWMD <br />Governing Board to impact these mangroves but for a well-demonstrated public safety bridge project. GF <br />would demonstratc that the proposed impacts are minimized and unavoidable. Mitigation at highcr rates than <br />impacts to natural, non-mitigation wetlands would be rcquircd (per Luis Otero and Lisa Spadafina, DERM <br />meeting held on April 18, 2007). <br />. Onsite mitigation unlikely, no appropriate nearby shoreline availablc. <br />. Offsite mitigation, possibly in Oleta River State Park, as done along with enhancing thc Mangrove Preserve, <br />(both on- and off-site mitigation offset the same project's impacts). Mitigation banks such as the FPL <br />Evcrglades Mitigation Bank (EMB) may also havc mangrove "credits" to sell. <br />. Seagrass impacts are mitigated on a case by case basis, and can include planting ("in-kind, direct" <br />mitigation); substrate restoration for seagrass natural recruitment ("in-kind, indirect" mitigation); or <br />combinations such as substrate restoration with a monitoring time period (3 - 5 ycars typically) followed by <br />planting seagrass "plugs" or "runners" to achieve minimum "success criteria" established in the permits. <br />Mitigation bank seagrass credits may also be available, possibly from FPL's EMB. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Required surveys/assessments: Thc Gannett Team has in-housc staff experienced conducting, documenting and <br />submitting required pcrmit application elements that will provide all scientific surveys or assessments for this project <br />(preliminary survey complete, see pictures below). <br />. ~~:I~ <br />.:~,~ .- '-:0 t.,. '~~.: <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.