Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Summary Minutes: Special City Commission Meeting <br /> <br />June 21, 2007 <br /> <br />Sunny Isles Beach, Florida <br /> <br />property owner fails to provide truthful and accurate information, staff is unable to <br />properly review the site plan and protect the citizens ofthis community. Based upon the <br />applications filed by Publix, it is clear they misrepresented the size of the development <br />parcel submitted for approval. For example, in its initial application to the City, Publix <br />represented the size of the property for development purposes to be 3.57 acres (attached <br />as Exhibit "B" to the City's Response). However, Publix later claimed to own a parcel <br />size of 17.13 acres, which included 3.57 upland, and 13.59 of submerged lands. The <br />submerged lands were purchased by Publix after the initial application, and were part of <br />revision to include a 140 slip marina (attached as Exhibit "D" and "K" to the City's <br />Response). During this same period, Publix submitted another site application to the <br />Shoreline Committee, and attested under oath that the parcel size for development <br />purposes was 5.41 acres, which included 3.57 acres of upland and 1.84 acres of <br />submerged land. However, the application to the Shoreline Committee contains no <br />mention at all of a marina or of the 13.59 acres of submerged land (attached as Exhibit <br />"L" to the City's Response). <br /> <br />In its appeal, Publix claims they were not required to disclose the marina to the Shoreline <br />Committee. However, as shown in Exhibit "L", the emails confirm the marina is <br />required to be included in addition to the submerged land. The inconsistent applications <br />filed by Publix clearly show an attempt to hide Publix' s plan to build a much larger <br />structure on 3.57 acres. It also shows an attempt by Publix to prevent the City <br />Commission, staff and the City Attorney from making an informed decision. The City <br />Code does not permit such conduct and the Commission should not allow it. <br /> <br />2. Presentation bv Publix Supermarkets. Inc. <br /> <br />[City Clerk's Note: Mr. Schulman submitted into the record its Appeal to City <br />Commission dated May 3, 2007, along with all attachments. Mr. Schulman also <br />submitted into the record the following documents: Westlaw-Metropolitan Dade County <br />v. Florida Processing Company; Westlaw-Cherry Communications, Inc. v. Deason; <br />Westlaw-Ford v. Bay County School Board; Email from Javier F Avino dated March <br />16, 2007 to Hans Ottinot, Jorge Vera, Elena Del Campillo, Robert Solera, Steve Belden, <br />Jasmine Barnes, Jane Hines, and John Szerlag re: Site Plan Application Z2005-09 with <br />attachments; and Copy of Check No. 009232from Greenberg Traurig in the amount of <br />$3,000.00 for the Administrative Appeal, and a copy of a letter from Clifford Schulman, <br />Esq. dated March 16, 2007 regarding the Appeal of Administrative Decision with <br />attachments.) <br /> <br />Action: Clifford Schulman, Esq., representing Publix, objected to the short period of <br />time of 10 minutes. He said they would incorporate into the record everything included <br />in their appeal letter dated May 3, 2007, including all the exhibits. <br /> <br />Mr. Schulman asked the Commission to take official notice of the legal proceedings in <br />"Publix vs. Sunny Isles Beach Case No. 0701659 CA-15", filed in the Circuit Court. Mr. <br />Schulman objected to the City Attorney sitting in on this matter as a matter of law. <br />According to Mr. Schulman, the appeal concerns a letter written by the City Attorney and <br /> <br />3 <br />