My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2024-3674
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2024
>
Reso 2024-3674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2024 9:05:08 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 3:49:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2024-3674
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/20/2024
Description
Approving Agreement w/ Nunez Construction for installation of an ER Generator and Building Restorations at Gateway Community Center.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that such work is required under the Contract and no further claim for such extras will be <br />considered or allowed by the City. <br />10.3.2.3. Changes in the Work directed by the Engineer / Architect shall become part <br />of the Contract only by written change order. <br />10.3.2.4. Information regarding changes in the Work for additional work, credits and <br />adjustments under the Contract shall be promptly transmitted in writing by the Contractor <br />to the Engineer / Architect with full explanations and justifications for consideration in <br />preparing a change order to the Contract. <br />10.3.2.5. Contractor shall allow twenty-one (21 ) calendar days for the Engineer / <br />Architect to review and respond to the City on Contractor submitted Requests for Change <br />Order pricing and Contractor submitted pricing for City initiated proposal requests. This <br />review time is only for correctly submitting pricing. Submitted pricing found not to be in <br />correct format, or containing pricing that relates to Work clearly not part of the change, or <br />contains SubContractor pricing not in the correct format, or contains Sub -Contractor pricing <br />that relates to Work clearly not part of the change, will not be reviewed and returned to <br />the Contractor for proper submission and as such, no Contractor claims for delay will be <br />accepted as a result of extended response time due to improper pricing submission. <br />10.3.2.6. The Engineer /Architect will review properly submitted Contractor pricing and <br />compare submitted pricing with published pricing data contained in the Building Cost Data, <br />Mechanical Cost Data and Electrical Cost Data, latest edition, as published by R.S. Means <br />Company, Inc. Contractor submitted pricing found to be in excess of five (5%) percent <br />above the stated published pricing will not be accepted and as such, no Contractor claims <br />for delay will be accepted as a result of extended response time due to excessive pricing <br />submittal by the Contractor. <br />10.3.3. The value of any change ordered under the Contract for extra work or any <br />reductions in work required, shall be determined under one or more of the following <br />procedures before a written change order is issued. <br />10.3.3.1. By Unit Price named in the contract or subsequently agreed upon by the City <br />and the Contractor, which prices shall include Contract6rs overhead and profit. <br />10.3.3.2. By Lump Sum Price agreed upon by the City and,the Contractors which pricc . <br />shall include overhead and profit. A breakdown of the estimated costs comprising the lump <br />sum price may be required by the Engineer / Architect for review. Percentage for overhead <br />and profit shall be determined in accordance with the method listed described under <br />Overhead and Profit below. <br />10.3.3.3. By a Cost Plus Price on total actual costs, plus an added percentage, all <br />determined as described under Overhead and Profit below. <br />Page 27 of 43 <br />295 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.