My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2015-2401
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2015
>
Reso 2015-2401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2015 10:06:03 AM
Creation date
5/21/2015 10:05:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2015-2401
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
04/16/2015
Description
Award Bid 14-11-01 & Agmt w/Florida Engineering & Development for 174th St Roadway Improve
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- <br /> �SVNNY rscFf <br /> -1• F t_O*% e� <br /> cf?'or sur+ '�c <br /> Addendum No. 3 <br /> CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH <br /> NE 174TH STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS <br /> CITY RFP No. 14-11-01 <br /> To All Bidders: <br /> Bidders for the above referenced project shall take note of the following changes, additions, <br /> deletions, clarifications, etc. to the Plans and Specifications, which in accordance with the <br /> Contract Documents shall become a part of and have precedence over anything shown or <br /> described otherwise. <br /> Questions/Clarifications: <br /> 1. Can you provide your anticipated budget? <br /> Response: A budget is intentionally not provided and we ask that proposers price the <br /> project accordingly based on their expertise. <br /> 2. Is there any page limitation for the response to this RFP? <br /> Response:Emphasis is to be made on the quality of the response and not quantity. <br /> 3. Under Section 5,Item 5—Cost of Services,it does not reference whether the price should <br /> be in a sealed envelope. Please clarify. <br /> Response:All price proposals shall be in a sealed envelope. <br /> 4. Asphalt Thickness: While reviewing the borings, I was unable to find the thickness of the <br /> existing asphalt. Please provide depth for pricing purposes. <br /> Response: Noted. According to the geotechnical report, 3"—4"of pavement thickness <br /> was encountered in the borings as stated on Page 5 of Wingerter Laboratory's report. <br /> Please refer to Attachment B of the bid documents. <br /> 5. Muck Removal: The borings shows that muck is existing throughout the <br /> neighborhood. However,I was unable to find any details regarding muck removal. Could <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.