My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Misc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(07-07-03) Prof. Eng. Consult for Collins Avenue Streetscape
>
Misc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 4:24:00 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 1:48:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Prof. Eng. Consult for Collins Avenue Streetscape
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
07-07-03
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Q: Do we do it in phases based on the budget? <br />A: No, look at the whole project. The City will phase it during construction. <br /> <br />Q: Do you want to use Standard Form 330 instead of 254 & 255? <br />A: You can't submit unless you are here at the meeting today, so since we have all the <br />participants, if everyone here would prefer the 330 then we will make the conversion. <br />There were no objections, so it was decided that we will use the 330, however the <br />254 & 255 will also be accepted. <br /> <br />Q: Is that included in the IS-pages, can we submit both? <br />A: No, it is not included in the 15 pages. Please get to the point within the 15 pages. <br />This is going to be based on your qualifications. Get to them, tell us why you are the <br />firm to pick over all the others because you are better at this particular project. <br /> <br />Q: This is the first time there has been a request for an Economist on the Team for <br />FDOT property, and he is not sure he can find one. [It was noted that there are <br />a lot out there. ] <br />A: We are not just looking at the FDOT property, the key is, the thing that we have <br />never had before, and that is the 1 O-foot easement on private property. How are we <br />going to make that viable for those businesses to want to participate in this process <br />rather than them fighting us every step of the way. What we need is something that <br />we can go to them with and say, it is your property, we got this easement, here is how <br />we can workjointly to develop this property and make it an assetfor both of us. You <br />may want to look at somebody who actually understands those kinds of business <br />relationships, who understands the financial aspects, and it may be an accountant <br />rather than an Economist but somebody who is going to make this viable. If you <br />have somebody on your team and you feel you don't need an Economist and you state <br />why they are better than anybody and you prove it, that's okay. We are trying to get <br />you to understand there is an issue here that needs to be addressed and that is how <br />are you going to get these businesses to come on board and make it acceptable to <br />them. <br /> <br />Q: You said the business is important, I thought you had a 10-foot easement to <br />build on? <br />A: We have the easement, the easement doesn't build, it doesn't create money, we are <br />going to build on that easement. <br /> <br />Q: The property owners will get something on that easement, he's not paying for it <br />is he? <br />A: We want to see what kind of options there are to get them involved. We are looking <br />for how this can be a participatory process. <br /> <br />Q: I understand you don't have the easements on the existing plan but is that <br />available to see, the existing plan that you have that you scrapped, can we get a <br />copy? <br />A: Yes, it will be sent out electronically. <br /> <br />Pre-Bid !\Ieeting Minutes RFQ 07-07-033 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.