Laserfiche WebLink
<br />F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S <br />QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT <br /> <br />(Present as many projects as requested by the agency. or 10 projects, If not specified. <br />Complete one Section F for each proJect.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) <br />Florida Department of Transportation, District 2, <br />Gainesville, FL <br /> <br />20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER <br /> <br />004 <br /> <br />22. YEARS COMPLETED <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If Applicable) <br /> <br />24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) <br /> <br />During a road construction project for SR 20 between Gainesville and Hawthorne Be Sure to Notice <br />FL, the roadway construction contractor did not place or maintain an effective <br />erosion control system. This resulted in the discharge of sediment laden <br />stormwater that accumulated in adjacent wetland areas. <br /> <br />Uncontrolled run-off of fill material from this construction site and roadway project <br />escaped into waterways and wetlands and formed significant deposits, 3 to 16 <br />inches over in 11 areas including wetlands and tributaries to the Lockloosa River in <br />Alachua County Florida. <br /> <br />This discharge resulted in excessive turbidity, burial of organic wetland soils, <br />changes to drainage patterns, loss of wetland function, and decreased hydraulic <br />capacity. These impacts violated State and Federal laws and responsible parties <br />were subject to civil penalties and fines levied by Florida's Water Management Districts, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and <br />Florida Department of Environmental Protection. <br /> <br />Typically efforts to remove sediment from wetlands are often hindered by regulatory policies prohibiting further impacts in the <br />form of root damage, plant loss, soil compaction, and turbidity <br />caused by heavy excavation equipment. Manual excavation, while <br />creating less disturbance is often slow, costly, and not entirely <br />effective, especially in cases where the sediment plume extends <br />far downstream. In addition, regulators require any damage <br />resulting from sediment excavation to be repaired, adding <br />significant cost and effort. <br /> <br />In particularly sensitive wetlands, costs of restoring damage <br />caused during remedial excavation can overwhelm the costs of <br />addressing the sediment plume. For the subject project, Shaw was <br />successful in developing low-impact sediment removal techniques <br />using vacuum dredging. These techniques are applicable to <br />streams, tributaries, swales, and wetlands, even in remote areas <br />or far downstream of the sediment source. <br /> <br />Using a combination of techniques including temporary de- <br />watering and diversion, hydraulic scouring, and vacuum extraction, Shaw was able to precisely control the depth of sediment <br />removal to expose the natural substrate, eliminate downstream discharge, avoid damage to root systems from cutting and soil <br />compaction, and limit impact to surrounding environments. <br /> <br />Using 6-inch aluminum intake tubing, the machine directly reached impact areas from the road shoulder and other locations <br />where a stable base material was established to a distance of 30 feet. Attachment of flex tubing or 6-inch PVC piping using PVC <br />couplings and/or flexible rubber Fernco-type adaptors was used to increase the effective length of the intake to a distance of 500 <br />feet. <br /> <br />Shaw's techniques have met with regulatory approval and are a preferred approach. They offer immediate cost reduction benefits <br />in that manpower needs are greatly reduced and that it lacks a large footprint that would require post-excavation repair, maintains <br />intact root systems along banks, has little effect on vegetation or soil conditions outside the excavation area, and does not <br />compromise bank integrity. These attributes are particularly valuable in sensitive environments, such as forested wetlands, where <br />restoration of impacts caused by traditional excavation techniques can be extremely difficult and costly. <br /> <br />In emergent wetlands and marshes, post-remedial planting was conducted to replace wetland structure and function after <br />sediment removal. Monitoring of replanting success is ongoing 7 months after installation and all areas exhibit good growth of <br />planted specimens, recruitment of new plants from surrounding areas and no evidence of disturbance. <br /> <br />23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION <br /> <br />a. PROJECT OWNER <br /> <br />b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME <br /> <br />c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br /> <br />386-961-7582 <br /> <br />· Innovative use of common vacuum <br />equipment - Shaw has pioneered <br />techniques for remediation of wetlands and <br />waterways impacted by sediment run-off <br />from construction sites. <br />· Time savings for client. <br />· Solution that was environmentally friendly; <br />limited impact to natural vegetation and <br />contours. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />FOOT 2 <br /> <br />Jenny Sargent <br /> <br />STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE F-1 <br />