My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Specifications
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(01-05-01) Landsc. Architectural Svcs.
>
Specifications
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 4:57:39 AM
Creation date
12/29/2010 1:35:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Landsc. Architectural Svcs.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
01-05-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
() The mistake is clearly evident on the face of the bid document <br />but the intended correct bid is not similarly evident; or <br />(2) The qualifier submits evidence, which clearly and convincingly <br />demonstrates that a mistake was made. All decisions to permit the <br />correction or withdrawal of qualification, or to cancel awards or <br />contracts based on bid mistakes, shall be supported by a written <br />determination made by the Purchasing Agent. <br />(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Commission shall have <br />the authority to waive any and all irregularities in any and all <br />qualifiers, or in the alternative, reject any proposal for qualifications. <br />5. Critical Issues. Describe any particular critical issues relating to timeliness or emphasis <br />on particular problem areas, etc. <br />6. Submittals. Include the following in your qualification: <br />6.1 Cover sheet of this Request for qualifications. <br />6.2 An informative, narrative report introducing your firm and location of the office <br />that will be responsible for the project. <br />6.3 A Statement of Qualifications. <br />6.4 A resume detailing experience and recommendations from prior jobs, if any. <br />6.5 Copies of the firm's professional licensures. <br />6.6 Any other forms that are required by the City and sample of similar work <br />performed by the firm. <br />6.7 Specification of how the final project will be submitted to the City, i.e., pad, GIF, <br />disk, etc. <br />7. Evaluation. Qualification will be evaluated using the following criteria. The criteria are <br />not listed in order of importance and additional criteria may be used. The City Manager <br />will have the final say on the evaluation criteria and will make the final selection in the <br />best interests of the City. <br />• Ability of professional personnel (including the <br />the capacity, ability and skill of the provider to <br />perform the contract; the character, integrity, <br />reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency <br />of the provider); 20 points <br />• Relevant Experience (including professional <br />licensure required when service of a skilled <br />nature as required by law to perform such <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />Landscape Architect Rfq Revised 05117101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.