Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Summary Minutes: Regular City Commission Meeting February 10,2005 <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida <br /> <br />not limited to" and added "not exceeding". Mayor Edelcup said that the Art in Public Places <br />Ordinance on the books is a voluntary submission by a developer and that hasn't produced <br />much in the way of voluntary art coming to the City and that is why he suggested that this <br />ordinance be put together. Deputy City Attorney Ottinot noted that Stanley Price and Clifford <br />Schulman spoke to him and the City Attorney this morning and raised some issues but they <br />haven't in fact provided legal or case law with respect to tell us that this ordinance is not <br />legally sufficient. <br /> <br />Public Speakers: Stanley Price, Esq.; Clifford Schulman, Esq.; Cassey Gabor <br /> <br />Stanley Price, Esq., stated that in his opinion this ordinance is facially unconstitutional <br />because of many reasons: the title is defective because it says Art in Public Places when in <br />fact the entire ordinance is Art in Private Places; a whereas clause generally sets the basis for <br />the ordinance and it says as these opportunities are diminished, what is diminished, the fact <br />that buildings are going where art can go?; the definition section, architectural enhancement, <br />you define it at great length and then don't use the term anywhere in the ordinance; <br />applicability, all multifamily developments and all commercial developments, it should be all <br />new developments; and that the Commission determines that good art is worth $500,000.00 or <br />1 % of the cost of construction. Commissioner Iglesias said that the intent is to make the City <br />more beautiful and is concerned what Mr. Price is saying that this ordinance is a violation of <br />the First Amendment he would favor getting an opinion and an expert who deals with the First <br />Amendment. Mr. Price suggested that it goes through Site Plan Review, the City has a gold <br />mine here and that is the ad valorem tax base when these buildings are completed and the City <br />should set aside a fund from the General Fund, the tax revenues, set aside 3% a year for art <br />and let the City put art on City-owned property and you have no right to do it on private <br />property. Deputy City Attorney Ottinot said he disagrees with Mr. Price because he had no <br />case law decisions, when you research you research within your own jurisdiction to see if <br />there is any precedent in respect to this ordinance and he looked around the State of Florida <br />and did not find any other city that adopted a similar ordinance. He said he researched and <br />found nine cities in California who adopted a similar ordinance requiring a developer to pay a <br />fee or construct a work of art on his or her property, and that the City of Palm Desert adopted <br />their ordinance in 1986 and has not been challenged. <br /> <br />Cliff Schulman, Esq., asked where the art was in the new Government Center and City <br />Manager Russo said for the record the City has spent between 7% - 17% of the cost of this <br />building on art and the art for this building is the entire Commission Chambers, design mosaic <br />tiles, and fountain around it and to include that item on this building would have been exactly <br />$1 Million less in cost so you can either calculate the $2.5 Million for the cost of the <br />Commission Chambers out of the $14.5 Million that this building cost or you can add back in <br />what it would have cost to just been part of the building then you've got $1 Million that we <br />put towards it and when you do that math that is 7% being conservative of the cost of this <br />building in art. Mr. Schulman said that you are making this City more and more expensive to <br />build in every day, there is no other city in the state of Florida, that will require a developer <br />not only to build all the infrastructure and all the other things that you want but then to give <br />the City anywhere between $.5 Million and $2 Million for what you consider to be art. He <br />said that the ordinance applies to anybody who wants to get a building permit, and that <br />includes people who have already received site plan approval for their building, on the other <br /> <br />7 <br />