Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Summary Minutes: Regular City Commission Meeting February 10,2005 <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida <br /> <br />hand the ordinance says that the art has to be approved as part ofthe Site Plan approval, and <br />are making this ordinance retroactively applicable. He suggested on projects that have already <br />received site plan approval don't have to have this ordinance applied to them at the time of the <br />building permit. He cited a couple of cases for the City Attorney to review ifthis ordinance is <br />deferred tonight, that you cannot exact from a developer something that is not reasonably <br />related, has a rational nexus to what that developer's impact is upon your community. Mr. <br />Schulman suggested unless you can show a rational nexus a connection between impact and <br />what you are asking a developer to give you or provide to the public, it is illegal and they have <br />asked the City Attorney to look into that. He said he agrees with Mr. Price, that the City is <br />discriminating against multi-family developments and commercial developers, and suggested <br />this ordinance be deferred. <br /> <br />Mayor Edelcup said that we can create a limit, and create a little more fairness by not going <br />retroactive back to any projects that have been previously approved. He said since we set a <br />$500,000.00 limit on art to be spent in a private place and it was open-ended as to what the <br />contribution would be in lieu ofthat in a public place, still trying to encourage art to be spent <br />locally at the private place he suggested capping the public place at $750,000.00, in other <br />words, it is a quarter of a million dollars more if you are going to give it to the City because <br />we would rather see it spent on the project or in the alternative make them equal at <br />$500,000.00. Commissioner Iglesias agreed with making it equal, but he said he doesn't think <br />that there will be a problem because the structures are works of art in themselves, but perhaps <br />a smaller building that cannot fit in a total of$500,000.00 that would put a nice water feature <br />that may cost $200,000.00 and then the difference of$300,000.00 would go to the City for a <br />combined total. Deputy City Attorney Ottinot noted on page 63 [in agenda package] item C, <br />allows what was just suggested. <br /> <br />Mayor Edelcup said then that they have a consensus here that they agree to a $500,000.00 cap <br />for both places, and the difference will go to the City ifthey don't spend the $500,000.00, and <br />that they are also agreeing that this is not going to apply retroactively. <br /> <br />Commissioner Goodman moved and Commissioner Iglesias seconded a motion to adopt the <br />ordinance, as amended. Ordinance No. 2005-221 was adopted by a roll call vote of 5-0 <br />in favor. <br />Vote: <br /> <br />Commissioner Brezin <br />Commissioner Goodman <br />Commissioner Iglesias <br />Vice Mayor Thaler <br />Mayor Edelcup <br /> <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br /> <br />Sitting in as the Local Planning Agency and the City Commission, to Consider an <br />Ordinance Amending the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) <br /> <br />9B.1 A Resolution of the Local Planning Agency of the City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida, <br />Recommending to the City Commission of Sunny Isles Beach, the Ordinance Amending <br />Section 265-46 "Off-Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards" of the Land <br />Development Regulations, to Repeal Section 265-46A (2) (b) which Provided for a Parking <br /> <br />8 <br />