Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br /> <br />personnel, project experience, organizational chart, etc. As these items are included in the <br />SF 330, does the City want the information repeated in both sections? <br />A5. Firms may submit the SF 330 in lieu of resumes. <br />Q6. Section 5.0 FORMAT, F. Firm References and Similar Work Completed, “The title and a <br />brief description of each project and/or service shall include:… Item e. - Past 5 years copies <br />of executed agreements made between your firm and local municipalities, with a scope <br />similar to this RFQ. If sub-consultants are a part of the proposed work plan, include items A <br />through E for each firm, including an organizational chart showing the relationship between <br />the responding firm and the sub firm(s).” Does the City want executed agreements included <br />for each project submitted as relevant experience, for each firm (prime and subs)? They are <br />generally lengthy. <br />A6. Due to the length of these agreements, if your firm has an active contract/PO within the <br />past 5 years with local municipalities please state the agency’s name, project scope and <br />contract amount in lieu of attaching the contract(s). <br />Q7. Does the City want copies of professional licenses included in Section E. Qualification <br />Information and Assigned Personnel or Section H. Forms and Attachments? <br />A7. Section E. <br />Q8. Pg. 12 of the above referenced RFQ states on page 12 (see attached) that at least 1 <br />Team member must be LEED Accredited. However we are a Structural Engineering Firm <br />and as such LEED is not applicable to our services. Therefore no one on our staff Is LEED <br />Accredited. Please advise if this precludes our firm from submitting for this solicitation. Thank <br />you. <br />A8. No, LEED would apply to architectural prime consultants. <br />Q9. We are an environmental consulting firm interested in pursuing the subject RFQ for the <br />“Environmental Engineering” discipline. However, Section 2.6.1 of the RFQ appears to <br />eliminate us from eligibility and so I’m writing for some clarification. We are not an <br />engineering, architecture, or landscape architecture firm. Our services are not regulated by <br />the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation and so we could not meet <br />the requirements of the last bullet of section 2.6.1, although we are properly registered and in <br />compliance with the State of Florida (Division of Corporations). Is it the City’s intent for the <br />“Environmental Engineering” discipline to only be serviced by licensed engineering firms? <br />I recognize the scope could be interpreted to focus on Phase I/Phase II Environmental <br />Assessments, in which case we would not be qualified. But the broad description of <br />“monitoring and mitigation, environmental studies and reports” and the permitting scope are <br />commonly used to describe our work, albeit associated with wetlands, protected wildlife <br />species, and water quality. I wanted to be sure this wasn’t an opportunity we were missing <br />due to a technicality the City didn’t intend. <br />A9. Environmental firms must comply with the requirements set forth in Section 2.6.1. of the <br />RFQ, including that they be registered and in compliance with the State of Florida in addition <br />to being licensed and registered with the Department of Business and Professional <br />Regulation to practice in their profession in the State of Florida.