My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Addendum No. 1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 10-09-01 Canopy for Government Center
>
Addendum No. 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2010 2:56:52 PM
Creation date
11/3/2010 2:45:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Design/Construc. Canopy at Government Center
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
10-09-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />3. What is the minimum area that has to be covered, can you define it? <br />No, what we are going to do when we walk out there is to show you what we want <br />covered. <br /> <br />4. But can you define what you want covered? <br />We can define it, let's say for example that we walk out and he wants it to at least reach <br />the sidewalk or five feet from the sidewalk, and if anyone is still not confident with that <br />response, send him an email at e:batista@sibfl.net and specifically say, can you give us <br />an exact dimension. Remember it is a proposal and it has got $50,000 attached to it. If <br />he were to tell you that we want a canvas commercial grade and he wants it 20-feet, and <br />you come back and say it is going to cost $90,000. He will get back to you by email, and <br />any additional information that is sent out to one individual will be posted on Demand <br />Star. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Batista took everyone outside to see the site. When everyone <br />returned, Mr. Batista summarized what was said outside for the record. He said that <br />he will distribute an Addendum to specify to some extent what the distance is from the <br />wall out for the canopy. He is also going to include in that Addendum, a clarification <br />on the structural elements, it is not very legible on the RFP. Also, we will include <br />whether or not we will trumpet it out, once you get past that corner wall, it goes from <br />the garage wall back to this building wall, it is going to trumpet it out, and so he will <br />make a clarification on that. The question on whether or not the palms are going to <br />have to be removed, the answer is that one of the palms we expect to have to be <br />removed, that will be on your nickel, and there is no replacement, just remove it. The <br />second palm if it gets in the way of your design, then we will have to make measures <br />and he will see if we can have someone remove it, if not we are going to try and keep as <br />much as possible on this site. On the electrical elements out there, we are going to <br />require that it be capped, and so we just want to make sure that if it is a dead end that <br />we cap it and be done with it. If it continues and is a series, then we will have to just <br />make that connection back. If it is in the way of your structural elements, he is <br />expecting you to move it to the side or around your structural element. As to the <br />canopy type itself, please provide in your proposal waterproof and water resistance, <br />and if it is going to change your price, we can make a determination at that point as to <br />whether we will go with the water proof material or a water resistant material, and it <br />must be fabric. <br /> <br />5. Is there any other underground utilities in that area? <br />Your structural person is going to have to call, when your guys come in and do the <br />foundation work, you have to call for locates. <br /> <br />6. I need to know this because of the cost of the work. <br />What we are talking about is your electrical 2-inch conduit, maybe 11/2 inch conduit. <br />Assume that in your proposal because that is what we styled there in terms of the lights. <br /> <br />Another point was, we spoke about the 75 MPH winds, we all know it has got to meet <br />the latest edition of FBC, and he clarified that we did make a comment that minimum <br />75 MPH removal, and he is not quite sure whether that still is the Code. He knows that <br /> <br />Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference QA 100610 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.