My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.#1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(06-12-02) General Engineering Consultants
>
Responses
>
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.#1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2012 4:15:21 AM
Creation date
1/24/2011 3:18:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Prof. General Engineering Consultant
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
06-12-02
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Calvin, Giorc ano & Associates, Inc. <br />• Design Decision Documentation <br />• Constructability Review <br />• Value Engineering <br />• "Community Engineering" <br />• Post - Construction Re- Examination <br />Each of these components is described in detail below: <br />Initial Quality of Design <br />The first step of the QA/QC process is to ensure that the design is of "high initial quality". In other words, the <br />preliminary design is one that has been carefully thought through and comprehensively analyzed by a <br />qualified engineer with expertise specific to the demands of the project. Designs tasks are not assigned to <br />engineers that do not have sufficient expertise in the areas required, or that do not have sufficient experience <br />to be able to make competent key decisions early in the design process. A preliminary design must be able to <br />stand alone on its own merits, and it is an unacceptable practice at CGA to allow engineers to omit "pieces" of <br />the design presuming agency reviewers or others will fill in the gaps. <br />Multi- discipline Peer Review <br />The next step in the QA/QC process is the performance of a multidiscipline peer review. This phase of <br />review is undertaken by a committee of designers from various disciplines within the firm (or "core team" <br />when teaming with others) so that potential improvements or innovative ideas can be introduced to further <br />improve the initial design. This process is important to ensure that related design elements from the various <br />disciplines work cohesively so that one discipline's component does not cause problems for another <br />discipline's portion of the design. A perfect example is in the design of a divided roadway with median <br />landscaping in which the roadway engineer, traffic engineer and landscape architect must make sure that all <br />sight distances and clear zones are maintained for the project. <br />This peer review group therefore may consist of the following: <br />• Roadway Engineers <br />• Civil Engineers <br />• Utilities/Drainage Engineers <br />• Traffic Engineers /Transportation Planners <br />• Land Planners <br />• Surveyors <br />• Urban Designers <br />• Landscape /Streetscape Architects <br />• Electrical Engineers <br />• Environmental Scientists <br />• Construction Management Personnel / CEI <br />This peer review is typically conducted in a "workshop" or "charrette" type setting in which participants sit <br />around a large conference table with the plans and have easels and/or white boards available to sketch out <br />concepts or revisions. The participants troubleshoot for fatal flaws, provide critiques, and generally toss <br />around, and often debate ideas and possible innovations to the plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.