My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.#1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(06-12-02) General Engineering Consultants
>
Responses
>
Calvin Giordano & Assoc.#1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2012 4:15:21 AM
Creation date
1/24/2011 3:18:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Prof. General Engineering Consultant
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
06-12-02
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />i , Giordano Associates, Inc. <br />equal or better design for less initial cost, or less overall cost during the lifetime of the project. This cost - <br />saving process is often automatically performed in the private sector simply because of the demands of the <br />client and private financing, but public sector projects are traditionally subjected to much thicker layers of <br />standardization which have had the unintended effect of creating less innovative, more "vanilla" projects. <br />Designers are sometimes afraid to stray from the standard designs due to liability or other reasons, and <br />therefore tend to stick with more standard, possibly over - designed projects that were ultimately more <br />expensive. <br />CGA believes that a true value engineering effort must include objective input from external reviewers <br />that are not necessarily familiar with the project. No matter how astute, the in -house designers involved <br />in a project are typically disadvantaged for being able to discern an innovative cost - saving solution or <br />alternative. We therefore utilize professionals from other consulting firms that we have a good working <br />relationship to participate in projects in which we invoke this external value engineering process. <br />"Community Engineering" <br />The term "community engineering ", or perhaps the more accurate "political engineering ", is a term we often <br />reserve for municipal projects to remind us that no matter how great we think our ultimate design may be, it <br />has to pass the less tangible test of being accepted by the public and community leaders. This means that the <br />design must be consistent and compatible with the adjacent surroundings and fit in with the objectives of the <br />neighborhood and prevailing political environment. On a more national scale, the Federal Highway <br />Administration and other professional engineering organizations have adopted the term "Context Sensitive <br />Design," and have established guidelines for federally funded projects in order ensure large projects are <br />compatible with the local character of the community. <br />• Therefore, "community engineering" or "context sensitivity" must be part of the first step of the design <br />process, and continue through to final plans preparation. Even in very small local improvement projects, this <br />concept is very important. Just imagine presenting a final intersection design that consisted of standard steel- <br />gray galvanized traffic signal mast -arms, concrete separators and concrete light poles at the end of a corridor <br />that was just designed by others with new landscaping, brick -paver islands and antique verde green street <br />lamps as part of another enhancement project. <br />• Post - Construction Re- Examination <br />This post- construction evaluation process is a process that CGA undertakes at the end of certain projects in <br />• order to learn more about what could have been done to produce an even better design. Much of the time, we <br />examine contractor's requests for information or unanticipated change orders that occurred during <br />construction. Sometimes we find that items that may have seemed clear to the engineer or designer were not <br />• clear or were misinterpreted in the field by the contractor. Sometimes contractors try to find ways to invoke <br />change orders, but other times, there are legitimate issues with the plans provided. As an example, we often <br />find that the provision of additional details, special details or more specific of notes would have alleviated <br />• many of these issues, and therefore we try to include these items in future plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.